## Clinical Assessment This patient has **inadequately controlled stable angina** despite monotherapy with a beta-blocker. He experiences 2–3 episodes per week, which indicates the need for optimization of antianginal therapy. ## Management Strategy for Stable Angina **Key Point:** The stepwise approach to stable angina management follows a tiered protocol: 1. First-line: Beta-blocker or rate-limiting calcium channel blocker 2. Second-line: Add a second agent from a different class (calcium channel blocker, long-acting nitrate, or ivabradine) 3. Third-line: Triple therapy or revascularization consideration ## Why Amlodipine Is the Correct Choice **High-Yield:** Amlodipine (a dihydropyridine calcium channel blocker) is the ideal second-line agent because: - It provides **additive antianginal benefit** when combined with beta-blockers - It causes **vasodilation** of coronary and peripheral vessels, reducing myocardial oxygen demand - It has **no negative inotropic effect** (unlike non-dihydropyridines), making it safe with beta-blockers - The patient's heart rate (58 bpm) is already controlled; further beta-blocker escalation risks bradycardia and hypotension **Clinical Pearl:** The combination of a beta-blocker + dihydropyridine calcium channel blocker is synergistic and well-tolerated, addressing both heart rate and vasodilation. ## Differential Consideration | Intervention | Rationale for/against | |---|---| | **Add amlodipine** | ✓ Correct: Second-line agent, different mechanism, safe combination | | **Increase atenolol** | ✗ Already on adequate dose; HR = 58 bpm suggests adequate beta-blockade | | **Nitroglycerin only** | ✗ Addresses acute symptoms but does not prevent recurrent episodes | | **Coronary angiography** | ✗ Premature; patient is stable, no high-risk features; medical optimization first | [cite:Harrison 21e Ch 297]
Sign up free to access AI-powered MCQ practice with detailed explanations and adaptive learning.