NEETPGAI
FeaturesBlogComparePricing
Log inStart Free
NEETPGAI

AI-powered NEET PG preparation platform. Master all 19 subjects with adaptive MCQs, AI tutoring, and spaced repetition.

Product

  • Features
  • Subjects
  • Previous Year Questions
  • Compare
  • Pricing
  • Blog

Features

  • Adaptive MCQ Practice
  • AI Tutor
  • Mock Tests
  • Spaced Repetition

Resources

  • Blog
  • Study Guides
  • NEET PG Updates
  • Contact & support

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service

Stay updated

© 2026 NEETPGAI. All rights reserved.
    Subjects/Surgery/Blunt Splenic Injury
    Blunt Splenic Injury
    medium
    scissors Surgery

    A 28-year-old man presents to the emergency department following a motor vehicle collision with left-sided rib fractures and left flank contusion. FAST examination reveals the structure marked **A** (hypoechoic subcapsular splenic hematoma) on the splenorenal view. The patient is hemodynamically stable with normal vital signs and no peritoneal signs. CT with IV contrast confirms AAST Grade II splenic injury without contrast extravasation or pseudoaneurysm. What is the most appropriate management strategy for this patient?

    A. Non-operative management with admission to ICU/HDU, bed rest, serial vital signs, and hematocrit monitoring
    B. Observation in the outpatient clinic with follow-up ultrasound in 1 week
    C. Urgent splenic artery angioembolization
    D. Immediate laparotomy with splenectomy

    Explanation

    Why Non-operative management with admission to ICU/HDU, bed rest, serial vital signs, and hematocrit monitoring is right

    The clinical anchor states that hemodynamically stable patients with AAST Grade I–III splenic injuries without contrast extravasation or pseudoaneurysm are candidates for non-operative management (NOM). This patient meets all criteria: stable hemodynamics, Grade II injury (subcapsular hematoma 10–50%), and no imaging signs of vascular injury. The structure marked A (hypoechoic subcapsular hematoma) is the hallmark of Grade I–II injury, which carries a high success rate for NOM when managed with ICU/HDU admission, bed rest, NPO status initially, serial vital signs, and transfusion as needed. This approach preserves splenic function and avoids post-splenectomy immunocompromise.

    Why each distractor is wrong

    • Immediate laparotomy with splenectomy: Reserved for hemodynamic instability unresponsive to resuscitation, peritonitis, or failure of NOM. This stable Grade II patient has no indication for operative intervention.
    • Urgent splenic artery angioembolization: Indicated only for contrast extravasation (blush), pseudoaneurysm, Grade IV–V injuries in stable patients, or declining hematocrit despite resuscitation. This patient has no contrast blush and Grade II injury.
    • Observation in the outpatient clinic with follow-up ultrasound in 1 week: Grade II splenic injury requires ICU/HDU admission for continuous monitoring, not outpatient observation. Risk of delayed hemorrhage necessitates inpatient surveillance.
    High-YieldNEET PG
    Hemodynamically stable Grade I–III splenic injury without contrast extravasation = non-operative management; contrast blush or Grade IV–V = consider angioembolization; hemodynamic instability = laparotomy.

    EAST Practice Management Guidelines + WSES 2022; AAST Splenic Injury Grading 2018 update

    Practice similar questions

    Sign up free to access AI-powered MCQ practice with detailed explanations and adaptive learning.

    Start Practicing Free More Surgery Questions