Boerhaave Syndrome MCQ — NEET PG Practice Question | NEETPGAI
Boerhaave Syndrome
medium
scissors Surgery
A 54-year-old man presents to the emergency department 6 hours after forceful retching and vomiting during a heavy meal. He reports sudden onset of severe retrosternal and epigastric pain radiating to the left shoulder, dyspnea, and neck swelling. On examination, a crunching sound synchronous with the heartbeat is heard on cardiac auscultation (Hamman sign). Chest X-ray shows left pleural effusion and pneumomediastinum. CT with water-soluble oral contrast reveals extravasation from the left posterolateral distal esophagus 3–5 cm above the gastroesophageal junction. The condition marked **B** in the diagram is suspected. Which of the following is the MOST APPROPRIATE immediate management for this hemodynamically stable patient presenting within 24 hours of symptom onset?
A. Cervical esophagostomy with gastric decompression and feeding jejunostomy
B. Left thoracotomy with primary esophageal repair and reinforced pleural/intercostal muscle flap with wide mediastinal drainage
C. Conservative management with broad-spectrum antibiotics, NPO, and serial imaging
D. Endoscopic placement of self-expanding metal stent (SEMS) with CT-guided drainage and NPO status
Explanation
Why left thoracotomy with primary repair is correct
The condition marked B is Boerhaave syndrome — spontaneous transmural esophageal rupture. The clinical presentation (Mackler triad: vomiting + lower chest pain + subcutaneous emphysema), imaging findings (pneumomediastinum, left pleural effusion, contrast extravasation from the left posterolateral distal esophagus), and timing (within 24 hours) all indicate a contained, acute rupture in a hemodynamically stable patient. According to Sabiston Textbook of Surgery and Bailey & Love, the gold standard for rupture diagnosed within 24 hours in stable patients is primary surgical repair via left thoracotomy, with longitudinal esophageal closure reinforced by a pleural or intercostal muscle flap and wide mediastinal drainage to prevent mediastinitis and sepsis. Time is the strongest predictor of outcome — diagnosis and repair within 12 hours carries mortality <10%, making urgent surgical intervention the priority.
Why each distractor is wrong
Endoscopic SEMS placement: While SEMS is a valid option for SELECT stable contained cases, it is NOT the first-line management in acute presentation within 24 hours. SEMS is reserved for patients who are poor surgical candidates or as a bridge in specific scenarios; primary surgical repair remains the gold standard for acute Boerhaave syndrome in stable patients within 24 hours.
Cervical esophagostomy with feeding jejunostomy: This is a damage-control approach reserved for patients presenting AFTER 24 hours, those who are septic or hemodynamically unstable, or when primary repair is not feasible. It is not appropriate for this acute, contained, stable presentation.
Conservative management with antibiotics and imaging: Boerhaave syndrome is a surgical emergency. Conservative management alone leads to mediastinitis, sepsis, and multi-organ failure, with mortality exceeding 50% if diagnosis is delayed beyond 24 hours. Antibiotics and NPO are adjuncts, not primary treatment.
High-YieldNEET PG
Boerhaave syndrome within 24 hours in stable patients = primary surgical repair via thoracotomy; after 24 hours or septic = damage control (esophageal exclusion + drainage + delayed reconstruction).
Sabiston Textbook of Surgery 21e; Bailey & Love 28e
Practice similar questions
Sign up free to access AI-powered MCQ practice with detailed explanations and adaptive learning.