NEETPGAI
BlogPricing
Log inStart Free
NEETPGAI

AI-powered NEET PG preparation platform. Master all 19 subjects with adaptive MCQs, AI tutoring, and spaced repetition.

Product

  • Subjects
  • Pricing
  • Blog

Features

  • Adaptive MCQ Practice
  • AI Tutor
  • Mock Tests
  • Spaced Repetition

Resources

  • Blog
  • Study Guides
  • NEET PG Updates
  • Help Center

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service

Stay updated

© 2026 NEETPGAI. All rights reserved.
    Subjects/Surgery/Burns — Assessment and Management
    Burns — Assessment and Management
    medium
    scissors Surgery

    A 28-year-old woman with 60% TBSA deep partial and full-thickness burns is admitted to the burn unit. On day 3, she develops fever (38.8°C), tachycardia (HR 120/min), and purulent drainage from the burn wound with surrounding erythema and edema. Which investigation is most appropriate to confirm burn wound infection and guide antimicrobial therapy?

    A. Blood culture
    B. Serum procalcitonin level
    C. Quantitative wound biopsy culture (≥10⁵ organisms per gram of tissue)
    D. Swab culture of the wound surface

    Explanation

    ## Diagnosis of Burn Wound Infection **Key Point:** Quantitative wound biopsy culture with a threshold of ≥10⁵ organisms per gram of tissue is the gold standard for diagnosing invasive burn wound infection and differentiating it from colonization. ### Why Quantitative Biopsy Culture? 1. **Defines infection vs. colonization:** - <10⁵ CFU/g = colonization (does not require systemic antibiotics) - ≥10⁵ CFU/g = invasive infection (requires systemic therapy and possible surgical debridement) 2. **Tissue-based diagnosis:** Biopsy samples the burn wound itself, not just the surface, reflecting true bacterial burden and invasion. 3. **Guides therapy:** Identifies the specific organism(s) and allows targeted antibiotic selection based on sensitivity. 4. **Prognostic value:** High bacterial loads (>10⁵) correlate with: - Increased risk of sepsis - Need for excision and grafting - Mortality risk ### Comparison of Diagnostic Methods | Method | Sensitivity | Specificity | Clinical Use | |---|---|---|---| | **Quantitative biopsy (≥10⁵)** | High | High | Gold standard; guides systemic therapy | | **Swab culture** | Low | Low | Identifies colonizing organisms only; surface flora | | **Blood culture** | Low | High | Positive only in septicemia; late finding | | **Procalcitonin** | Moderate | Moderate | Marker of systemic inflammation; not diagnostic | **Clinical Pearl:** Burn wound infection typically presents on **days 3–7** post-injury with fever, tachycardia, and purulent drainage with surrounding cellulitis — exactly as in this case. This is the classic presentation of invasive burn wound infection. **High-Yield:** The **Lund-Browder chart** is used for TBSA assessment, but once infection is suspected, quantitative biopsy is the investigation of choice. Surface swabs are **NOT** reliable because they do not differentiate colonization from invasion. **Mnemonic: BIOPSY-5** — **B**urn wound → **I**nvasion suspected → **O**btain tissue → **P**rocess for culture → **S**et threshold at 10⁵ → **Y**ield organism ID and sensitivities. ![Burns — Assessment and Management diagram](https://mmcphlazjonnzmdysowq.supabase.co/storage/v1/object/public/blog-images/explanation/16187.webp)

    Practice similar questions

    Sign up free to access AI-powered MCQ practice with detailed explanations and adaptive learning.

    Start Practicing Free More Surgery Questions