NEETPGAI
BlogComparePricing
Log inStart Free
NEETPGAI

AI-powered NEET PG preparation platform. Master all 19 subjects with adaptive MCQs, AI tutoring, and spaced repetition.

Product

  • Subjects
  • Previous Year Questions
  • Compare
  • Pricing
  • Blog

Features

  • Adaptive MCQ Practice
  • AI Tutor
  • Mock Tests
  • Spaced Repetition

Resources

  • Blog
  • Study Guides
  • NEET PG Updates
  • Help Center

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service

Stay updated

© 2026 NEETPGAI. All rights reserved.
    Subjects/Radiology/CT — Hepatocellular Carcinoma Arterial Wash-In Wash-Out (LI-RADS 5)
    CT — Hepatocellular Carcinoma Arterial Wash-In Wash-Out (LI-RADS 5)
    hard
    scan Radiology

    A 58-year-old man with a 15-year history of hepatitis B cirrhosis undergoes surveillance CT with multiphase contrast imaging. A 2.2 cm nodule is identified in the right lobe. The structure marked **A** in the diagram demonstrates arterial phase hyperenhancement with portal venous phase washout and an enhancing capsule. The patient's alpha-fetoprotein is 180 ng/mL. Based on the imaging characteristics shown, what is the most appropriate next step in management according to current BCLC staging guidelines?

    A. Repeat imaging in 3 months to confirm diagnosis before initiating treatment
    B. Systemic therapy with atezolizumab plus bevacizumab
    C. Resection, liver transplantation, or radiofrequency ablation depending on liver function and candidacy
    D. Transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) as first-line therapy

    Explanation

    ## Why Resection, liver transplantation, or radiofrequency ablation is correct The imaging pattern shown at **A** — arterial hyperenhancement with portal venous washout and enhancing capsule — meets LI-RADS 5 criteria for definite hepatocellular carcinoma in a cirrhotic patient, requiring no biopsy. This 2.2 cm solitary lesion corresponds to BCLC Stage 0/A (very early to early HCC). According to Harrison 21e Chapter 78 and AASLD guidelines, Stage 0/A disease is managed with curative-intent therapies: resection (if preserved liver function), orthotopic liver transplantation (if within Milan criteria: 1 lesion ≤5 cm), or ablation (radiofrequency or microwave ablation). The choice depends on the degree of cirrhosis, portal hypertension, and transplant candidacy. ## Why each distractor is wrong - **Transarterial chemoembolization (TACE)**: TACE is the standard first-line therapy for BCLC Stage B (intermediate HCC with multinodular disease without vascular invasion). This patient has a single small lesion (Stage 0/A), which is amenable to curative therapy, not palliative TACE. - **Systemic therapy with atezolizumab plus bevacizumab**: This combination is first-line for BCLC Stage C (advanced HCC with vascular invasion or extrahepatic metastases), as demonstrated in the IMbrave150 trial. Stage 0/A disease should not receive systemic therapy as initial management. - **Repeat imaging in 3 months**: LI-RADS 5 imaging findings in a cirrhotic patient are diagnostic of HCC without need for biopsy or confirmatory imaging. Delaying treatment by 3 months is inappropriate and risks tumor progression; threshold growth ≥50% in ≤6 months also defines HCC, but a lesion meeting LI-RADS 5 criteria requires immediate staging and treatment planning. **High-Yield:** Arterial wash-in + venous washout + enhancing capsule in a cirrhotic liver = LI-RADS 5 HCC; BCLC Stage 0/A (solitary ≤5 cm) → curative intent (resection/transplant/ablation); Stage B (multinodular) → TACE; Stage C (vascular invasion) → atezolizumab + bevacizumab. [cite: Harrison 21e Ch 78 (Liver and Biliary Tract Cancers)]

    Practice similar questions

    Sign up free to access AI-powered MCQ practice with detailed explanations and adaptive learning.

    Start Practicing Free More Radiology Questions