NEETPGAI
FeaturesNEET PGFMGEINI-CETBlogPricing
Log inStart Free
NEETPGAI

AI-powered NEET PG preparation platform. Master all 19 subjects with adaptive MCQs, AI tutoring, and spaced repetition.

Product

  • Features
  • Subjects
  • Previous Year Questions
  • NEET PG Preparation
  • FMGE Preparation
  • INI-CET Preparation
  • Compare
  • Pricing
  • Blog

Features

  • Adaptive MCQ Practice
  • AI Tutor
  • Mock Tests
  • Spaced Repetition

Resources

  • Blog
  • Study Guides
  • NEET PG Updates
  • Contact & support

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service

Stay updated

© 2026 NEETPGAI. All rights reserved.
    Subjects/Medicine/ECG Interpretation Basics
    ECG Interpretation Basics
    medium
    stethoscope Medicine

    A 62-year-old woman with chronic atrial fibrillation and a rapid ventricular response (heart rate 135 bpm) presents to the emergency department. Her ECG shows irregular narrow-complex tachycardia with an absent P wave and a ventricular rate of 130–140 bpm. She is hemodynamically stable. What is the drug of choice for rate control in this acute presentation?

    A. Intravenous amiodarone
    B. Intravenous verapamil
    C. Oral digoxin
    D. Intravenous diltiazem

    Explanation

    Acute Rate Control in Atrial Fibrillation

    Key Point
    In hemodynamically stable patients with rapid atrial fibrillation, intravenous calcium channel blockers (verapamil or diltiazem) are first-line agents for acute rate control.

    Mechanism of Action

    Diltiazem (and verapamil) are non-dihydropyridine calcium channel blockers that:

    • Slow AV nodal conduction by blocking L-type calcium channels
    • Increase AV nodal refractoriness
    • Reduce ventricular response rate in atrial fibrillation
    • Onset of action: 2–5 minutes (IV); peak effect: 5–10 minutes

    Comparison of Rate-Control Agents in Acute AF

    Table
    AgentRouteOnsetPeakHemodynamic EffectUse in Stable AF
    DiltiazemIV2–5 min5–10 minMild ↓ BP, ↓ HRFirst-line
    VerapamilIV3–5 min5–10 minModerate ↓ BP, ↓ HRAlternative
    AmiodaroneIV5–30 min30–60 minVariable; ↓ BP riskUnstable/resistant
    DigoxinOral/IV30–60 min4–6 hrsVagomimeticChronic use; slow onset
    High-YieldNEET PG
    Diltiazem is preferred over verapamil in acute AF because it has a faster onset, better hemodynamic tolerance, and fewer negative inotropic effects. Verapamil is an acceptable alternative but is less commonly chosen in acute settings.

    Why Diltiazem Is Optimal in This Case

    1. 1.
      Rapid onset: Achieves rate control within 5–10 minutes
    2. 2.
      Hemodynamic stability: Minimal myocardial depression; safe in stable patients
    3. 3.
      Efficacy: Reduces ventricular rate by 20–30% in most patients
    4. 4.
      No need for loading: Single IV bolus often sufficient
    Clinical Pearl
    Diltiazem IV bolus is typically 0.25 mg/kg over 2 minutes, followed by a second dose if needed. A continuous infusion can be started for sustained rate control.

    Why Other Agents Are Not First-Line Here

    • Amiodarone: Reserved for hemodynamically unstable patients or when rate control fails; slower onset and greater hemodynamic risk
    • Digoxin: Slow onset (30–60 minutes); better for chronic rate control; less effective in high adrenergic states
    • Verapamil: Similar efficacy to diltiazem but slightly slower onset and greater negative inotropic effect

    Harrison 21e Ch 226

    Practice similar questions

    Sign up free to access AI-powered MCQ practice with detailed explanations and adaptive learning.

    Start Practicing Free More Medicine Questions

    Join our NEET PG community

    Daily MCQs, study tips, and topper strategies on Telegram.

    Join on Telegram →