NEETPGAI
FeaturesBlogComparePricing
Log inStart Free
NEETPGAI

AI-powered NEET PG preparation platform. Master all 19 subjects with adaptive MCQs, AI tutoring, and spaced repetition.

Product

  • Features
  • Subjects
  • Previous Year Questions
  • Compare
  • Pricing
  • Blog

Features

  • Adaptive MCQ Practice
  • AI Tutor
  • Mock Tests
  • Spaced Repetition

Resources

  • Blog
  • Study Guides
  • NEET PG Updates
  • Contact & support

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service

Stay updated

© 2026 NEETPGAI. All rights reserved.
    Subjects/Medicine/Esophageal Varices Grade III with Red Wale Marks
    Esophageal Varices Grade III with Red Wale Marks
    medium
    stethoscope Medicine

    A 52-year-old man with decompensated cirrhosis (Child-Pugh C) presents with hematemesis. Upper endoscopy reveals Grade III esophageal varices with red wale marks. After acute variceal bleeding is controlled with vasoactive therapy and urgent endoscopic variceal ligation, the patient is stabilized. Which of the following represents the most appropriate management strategy marked as **A** in the diagram for secondary prophylaxis to prevent rebleeding?

    A. TIPS as first-line therapy without endoscopic intervention
    B. Surgical portacaval shunt as initial management
    C. Continue observation without intervention
    D. Endoscopic band ligation plus non-selective beta-blocker for secondary prophylaxis

    Explanation

    Why Endoscopic band ligation plus non-selective beta-blocker is correct

    The BAVENO VII Consensus (2022) and AASLD guidelines establish that secondary prophylaxis after variceal bleeding requires combination therapy: endoscopic variceal ligation (EVL) repeated every 2–4 weeks until variceal eradication, PLUS a non-selective beta-blocker (NSBB, preferably carvedilol 6.25–12.5 mg daily). This combination is the standard of care because 70% of survivors will rebleed within 1 year without secondary prophylaxis. The structure marked A encapsulates this dual approach, which reduces rebleeding risk by approximately 50% compared to either modality alone. Grade III varices with red wale marks (indicating high wall tension and imminent bleeding risk) mandate aggressive secondary prophylaxis to prevent the 15–20% 6-week mortality associated with recurrent hemorrhage.

    Why each distractor is wrong

    • Continue observation without intervention: Observation alone after variceal bleeding is contraindicated. Without secondary prophylaxis, rebleeding occurs in ~70% of survivors within 1 year, with each episode carrying 15–20% mortality. This violates standard of care.
    • TIPS as first-line therapy without endoscopic intervention: TIPS (transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt) is reserved for refractory rebleeding (failure of EVL + NSBB) or as a bridge in fulminant cases (Child-Pugh C with active bleeding within 72 h). It is not first-line secondary prophylaxis and carries risks of hepatic encephalopathy and shunt stenosis.
    • Surgical portacaval shunt as initial management: Surgical shunting is rarely used in modern practice, reserved only for transplant-ineligible patients with refractory bleeding after TIPS failure. It has higher morbidity and mortality than endoscopic/pharmacologic approaches and is not indicated for secondary prophylaxis in the acute post-bleeding phase.
    High-YieldNEET PG
    Secondary prophylaxis after variceal bleeding = EVL every 2–4 weeks + NSBB (carvedilol preferred); TIPS reserved for refractory rebleeding or fulminant Child C cases.

    BAVENO VII Consensus 2022; AASLD Portal Hypertension Guidelines 2024

    Practice similar questions

    Sign up free to access AI-powered MCQ practice with detailed explanations and adaptive learning.

    Start Practicing Free More Medicine Questions