A 35-year-old woman presents with sudden-onset haematuria, hypertension (BP 162/104 mmHg), and mild facial oedema. Serum creatinine is 2.8 mg/dL (baseline 0.9), and urinalysis shows dysmorphic RBCs, RBC casts, and 3.5 g/day proteinuria. Complement C3 is markedly reduced (8 mg/dL; normal >30). Renal ultrasound shows normal-sized kidneys. Serologies for ANA, ANCA, and anti-GBM are negative. What is the most appropriate next step in management?
A. Initiate plasma exchange immediately and defer biopsy pending clinical response
B. Perform renal biopsy urgently to confirm diagnosis and guide immunosuppressive therapy
C. Start high-dose oral corticosteroids (1 mg/kg/day) and plan renal biopsy within 1 week
D. Start ACE inhibitor monotherapy and observe renal function for 4 weeks
Explanation
Clinical Presentation Analysis
This patient presents with rapidly progressive glomerulonephritis (RPGN) with features suggestive of membranoproliferative glomerulonephritis (MPGN) or C3 glomerulonephritis:
Post-infectious GN (less likely given rapid progression)
4.
Negative serologies — rules out lupus, ANCA-associated vasculitis, anti-GBM disease
5.
Normal kidney size — excludes chronic kidney disease; acute process
Why Renal Biopsy is Essential
High-YieldNEET PG
In RPGN with C3 deposition and negative serologies, renal biopsy is mandatory to:
1.
Confirm diagnosis — differentiate MPGN from C3GN from other patterns
2.
Assess for crescents — presence/absence determines prognosis and treatment intensity
3.
Guide immunosuppression — biopsy findings determine whether to use steroids ± cyclophosphamide vs. alternative agents
4.
Establish baseline — allows comparison if repeat biopsy needed
Key Point
Biopsy should be performed urgently (within 1–2 weeks) because:
Rapidly progressive disease may progress to end-stage renal disease
Early immunosuppression guided by biopsy improves outcomes
Delay risks irreversible renal damage
Management Algorithm
Loading diagram...
Why NOT Other Options?
Option 1: High-dose steroids without biopsy
Trap: Starting immunosuppression before biopsy diagnosis is suboptimal
Biopsy findings determine whether additional agents (cyclophosphamide) are needed
Steroids alone may be insufficient for crescentic disease
Delaying biopsy risks irreversible renal damage
Option 2: Plasma exchange immediately
Trap: Plasma exchange is NOT indicated for MPGN or C3GN
PE is reserved for:
Anti-GBM disease (negative here)
ANCA-associated vasculitis with pulmonary haemorrhage (ANCA negative here)
Thrombotic microangiopathies (no clinical evidence)
Premature PE exposes patient to unnecessary morbidity
Option 3: ACE inhibitor monotherapy
Trap: Monotherapy is inadequate for RPGN
ACE inhibitors provide renal protection but do NOT arrest rapidly progressive disease
Waiting 4 weeks risks progression to ESRD
This approach is appropriate only for stable, non-progressive GN
Clinical Pearl
The marked C3 reduction (8 mg/dL) is the diagnostic linchpin. Combined with:
Rapid renal decline
Negative serologies (ANA, ANCA, anti-GBM)
Acute nephritic picture
This pattern strongly suggests C3-mediated GN (MPGN or C3GN), which requires biopsy for precise classification and to assess crescentic involvement. Treatment intensity depends on biopsy findings.
Post-Biopsy Management
If crescents present (>50%):
High-dose IV methylprednisolone 500 mg daily × 3 days, then oral prednisolone 1 mg/kg/day
Cyclophosphamide 0.5–1 g/m² IV monthly × 6 months OR oral daily
If no crescents (MPGN/C3GN pattern):
Oral prednisolone 0.5–1 mg/kg/day
Consider additional agents (mycophenolate, C5 inhibitor) based on response
Practice similar questions
Sign up free to access AI-powered MCQ practice with detailed explanations and adaptive learning.