NEETPGAI
BlogComparePricing
Log inStart Free
NEETPGAI

AI-powered NEET PG preparation platform. Master all 19 subjects with adaptive MCQs, AI tutoring, and spaced repetition.

Product

  • Subjects
  • Previous Year Questions
  • Compare
  • Pricing
  • Blog

Features

  • Adaptive MCQ Practice
  • AI Tutor
  • Mock Tests
  • Spaced Repetition

Resources

  • Blog
  • Study Guides
  • NEET PG Updates
  • Help Center

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service

Stay updated

© 2026 NEETPGAI. All rights reserved.
    Subjects/Surgery/Hepatobiliary Pancreatic Surgery
    Hepatobiliary Pancreatic Surgery
    medium
    scissors Surgery

    The best method to obtain tissue for the diagnosis of pancreatic carcinoma is:

    A. Percutaneous transperitoneal biopsy
    B. Transgastric FNAC guided by endoscopic ultrasound
    C. MRI – guided biopsy
    D. Laparoscopic – guided biopsy

    Explanation

    ## Correct Answer: B. Transgastric FNAC guided by endoscopic ultrasound Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration cytology (EUS-FNAC) is the gold standard for pancreatic tissue diagnosis because it combines real-time ultrasound visualization with direct endoscopic access. The transgastric approach allows the endoscope to be positioned within 2–3 cm of the pancreatic head and body, enabling high-resolution imaging and precise needle placement under direct visualization. This technique achieves diagnostic accuracy of 85–95% with minimal morbidity. The needle passes through the gastric wall directly into the lesion, avoiding peritoneal contamination and reducing infection risk. EUS-FNAC is particularly superior for small lesions (<3 cm) that may be missed on CT or MRI. In Indian practice, this is the preferred first-line method at tertiary centers for suspected pancreatic malignancy, as it provides cytological diagnosis with low complication rates (pancreatitis <1%, bleeding <0.5%), allows tissue for immunohistochemistry and molecular testing, and can be performed as an outpatient procedure. The transgastric route specifically avoids the need for percutaneous approaches that risk peritoneal seeding in malignancy. ## Why the other options are wrong **A. Percutaneous transperitoneal biopsy** — This is wrong because percutaneous biopsy carries a significant risk of peritoneal seeding and tumor spillage in pancreatic malignancy, potentially upstaging the cancer and compromising surgical resectability. It also has higher morbidity (pancreatitis, bleeding, infection) and lower diagnostic accuracy (~70%) compared to EUS-FNAC. Percutaneous approaches are reserved only when EUS is contraindicated or non-diagnostic. **C. MRI – guided biopsy** — This is wrong because MRI guidance lacks real-time visualization and requires needle repositioning based on imaging intervals, making it technically difficult and time-consuming for pancreatic lesions. MRI-guided biopsy is rarely used for pancreatic diagnosis in clinical practice; it is primarily reserved for liver or other solid organ biopsies. The pancreas is a small, mobile organ that moves with respiration, making MRI guidance impractical and less accurate than EUS. **D. Laparoscopic – guided biopsy** — This is wrong because laparoscopic biopsy is an invasive surgical procedure requiring general anesthesia and carries higher morbidity than EUS-FNAC. It is reserved for staging and tissue diagnosis only when EUS has failed or when simultaneous staging laparoscopy is planned for resectable tumors. It is not a first-line diagnostic method and exposes the patient to unnecessary operative risk when a minimally invasive alternative exists. ## High-Yield Facts - **EUS-FNAC** is the gold standard for pancreatic tissue diagnosis with 85–95% sensitivity and <1% pancreatitis risk. - **Transgastric approach** allows proximity of 2–3 cm to pancreatic head/body, enabling high-resolution imaging and precise needle placement. - **Percutaneous biopsy** risks peritoneal seeding and tumor spillage, potentially upstaging pancreatic malignancy and compromising resectability. - **EUS-FNAC** is superior for lesions <3 cm that may be missed on CT/MRI and allows tissue for immunohistochemistry and molecular testing. - **Laparoscopic biopsy** is reserved for staging and tissue diagnosis only when EUS fails or simultaneous staging is planned; not first-line. ## Mnemonics **EUS-FNAC Advantage: BEST** **B**iopsy with **E**ndoscopy **S**afely **T**ransgastric — Real-time visualization, minimal morbidity, no peritoneal seeding, outpatient procedure. **Why NOT Percutaneous: SPILL** **S**eeding risk, **P**eritoneal contamination, **I**ncreased morbidity, **L**ower accuracy, **L**ess preferred in malignancy. ## NBE Trap NBE may pair "percutaneous biopsy" with "direct access" to lure students into choosing it as the most direct route, overlooking the critical risk of peritoneal seeding in pancreatic malignancy. The trap conflates "direct access" with "safe access." ## Clinical Pearl In Indian tertiary centers, EUS-FNAC has become the standard outpatient diagnostic tool for suspected pancreatic malignancy, allowing same-day tissue diagnosis without operative risk. A patient with jaundice and a pancreatic head mass can be diagnosed and staged within 48 hours using EUS-FNAC, enabling rapid surgical planning for resectable cases. _Reference: Bailey & Love Ch. 65 (Pancreatic Surgery); Harrison Ch. 307 (Pancreatic Cancer)_

    Practice similar questions

    Sign up free to access AI-powered MCQ practice with detailed explanations and adaptive learning.

    Start Practicing Free More Surgery Questions