NEETPGAI
FeaturesBlogComparePricing
Log inStart Free
NEETPGAI

AI-powered NEET PG preparation platform. Master all 19 subjects with adaptive MCQs, AI tutoring, and spaced repetition.

Product

  • Features
  • Subjects
  • Previous Year Questions
  • Compare
  • Pricing
  • Blog

Features

  • Adaptive MCQ Practice
  • AI Tutor
  • Mock Tests
  • Spaced Repetition

Resources

  • Blog
  • Study Guides
  • NEET PG Updates
  • Contact & support

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service

Stay updated

© 2026 NEETPGAI. All rights reserved.
    Subjects/Pathology/Hepatocellular Carcinoma
    Hepatocellular Carcinoma
    medium
    microscope Pathology

    A 58-year-old man with Child-Pugh class B cirrhosis secondary to chronic hepatitis B presents with right upper quadrant pain and weight loss. Multiphasic CT imaging shows a 4 cm solitary lesion in the right lobe with arterial phase hyperenhancement and venous phase washout. The structure marked **B** in the diagram demonstrates vascular invasion of the portal vein. Which of the following is the most appropriate next step in management for this patient?

    A. Transarterial chemoembolization (TACE)
    B. Sorafenib monotherapy as first-line systemic therapy
    C. Liver transplantation per Milan criteria
    D. Hepatic resection with curative intent

    Explanation

    Why Transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) is right

    The presence of vascular (portal vein) invasion in HCC, as shown at structure B, is a hallmark feature that excludes the patient from curative-intent surgical resection and transplantation. According to BCLC staging and AASLD guidelines, vascular invasion represents advanced-stage disease (BCLC-C). While the tumor is solitary and <5 cm, the portal vein invasion violates the Milan criteria (which explicitly exclude vascular invasion) and renders hepatic resection inappropriate due to high recurrence risk. TACE is the standard locoregional therapy for intermediate-stage HCC and remains a reasonable option for select advanced cases with preserved performance status and liver function (Child-Pugh B). It delivers chemotherapy directly via the hepatic artery—the primary blood supply to HCC—while occluding the tumor vasculature.

    Why each distractor is wrong

    • Liver transplantation per Milan criteria: Milan criteria explicitly exclude patients with vascular invasion. Although the tumor is solitary and <5 cm, the portal vein invasion documented at structure B makes this patient ineligible for transplantation, which is reserved for HCC without vascular invasion.
    • Hepatic resection with curative intent: Vascular invasion is a contraindication to surgical resection due to extremely high recurrence and mortality rates. While the patient has a solitary lesion, the portal vein invasion at structure B precludes curative resection; resection would be palliative at best and is not the standard approach.
    • Sorafenib monotherapy as first-line systemic therapy: Although sorafenib is an approved option for advanced HCC, it is not the first-line systemic agent. Current evidence (IMbrave150 trial, AASLD 2023) favors atezolizumab + bevacizumab as first-line for advanced disease. Moreover, locoregional therapy (TACE) is preferred over systemic therapy alone in this setting given the patient's preserved performance status and liver function.
    High-YieldNEET PG
    Vascular invasion in HCC excludes transplantation and resection; it defines BCLC-C (advanced) disease and mandates locoregional or systemic therapy depending on performance status and liver reserve.

    Robbins Pathologic Basis of Disease 11e; AASLD HCC Guidelines 2023; BCLC Update 2022

    Practice similar questions

    Sign up free to access AI-powered MCQ practice with detailed explanations and adaptive learning.

    Start Practicing Free More Pathology Questions