NEETPGAI
FeaturesBlogComparePricing
Log inStart Free
NEETPGAI

AI-powered NEET PG preparation platform. Master all 19 subjects with adaptive MCQs, AI tutoring, and spaced repetition.

Product

  • Features
  • Subjects
  • Previous Year Questions
  • Compare
  • Pricing
  • Blog

Features

  • Adaptive MCQ Practice
  • AI Tutor
  • Mock Tests
  • Spaced Repetition

Resources

  • Blog
  • Study Guides
  • NEET PG Updates
  • Contact & support

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service

Stay updated

© 2026 NEETPGAI. All rights reserved.
    Subjects/Dermatology/Mycosis Fungoides — Pautrier Microabscess
    Mycosis Fungoides — Pautrier Microabscess
    medium
    hand Dermatology

    A 58-year-old man presents with a 3-year history of non-pruritic, finely scaling erythematous patches on his buttocks and lower trunk that have been refractory to topical corticosteroids. Punch biopsy shows epidermotropic atypical lymphocytes with cerebriform nuclei and the histologic finding marked **A** in the diagram. Immunohistochemistry reveals CD2+, CD3+, CD4+ tumor cells with loss of CD7. TCR gene rearrangement studies show a monoclonal T-cell population. What is the most likely diagnosis?

    A. Cutaneous lupus erythematosus
    B. Pityriasis rosea
    C. Mycosis fungoides, patch stage
    D. Psoriasis vulgaris

    Explanation

    Why Mycosis fungoides, patch stage is right

    Mycosis fungoides (MF) is the most common cutaneous T-cell lymphoma (CTCL), an indolent non-Hodgkin lymphoma derived from mature skin-homing CD4+ memory T cells. The clinical presentation—non-pruritic erythematous patches on sun-protected areas (bathing-trunk distribution: buttocks, lower trunk) in a 50–60-year-old male—is classic for patch-stage MF. The histopathologic hallmark is epidermotropism (atypical lymphocytes infiltrating the epidermis without significant spongiosis), and the structure marked A (Pautrier microabscesses—small, well-circumscribed intraepidermal clusters of atypical lymphocytes) is highly suggestive of MF, though seen in only 10–37% of cases. The immunophenotype (CD2+, CD3+, CD4+, CD5+, loss of CD7, CD8 negative) and monoclonal TCR gene rearrangement confirm the diagnosis. Early MF is often misdiagnosed as eczema or psoriasis for years, making the distinction critical (WHO-EORTC Classification of Cutaneous Lymphomas 2018).

    Why each distractor is wrong

    • Cutaneous lupus erythematosus: Presents with photosensitive plaques and systemic features; immunohistochemistry shows interface dermatitis with IgG/IgM deposition at the dermal-epidermal junction, not epidermotropic CD4+ T-cell infiltrates or Pautrier microabscesses. TCR gene rearrangement is polyclonal, not monoclonal.
    • Psoriasis vulgaris: Characterized by acanthosis, parakeratosis, and regular elongation of rete ridges with prominent spongiosis and neutrophilic microabscesses in the stratum corneum (not intraepidermal clusters of atypical lymphocytes). Immunohistochemistry shows polyclonal T-cell infiltrate, not monoclonal CD4+ population with loss of CD7.
    • Pityriasis rosea: A benign, self-limited exanthem with superficial perivascular lymphocytic infiltrate and spongiosis, lacking epidermotropism, Pautrier microabscesses, cerebriform nuclei, or monoclonal TCR rearrangement.
    High-YieldNEET PG
    Pautrier microabscesses (intraepidermal clusters of atypical lymphocytes) + epidermotropism + CD4+ phenotype + monoclonal TCR = mycosis fungoides; early patch-stage MF mimics eczema/psoriasis for years, so maintain high clinical suspicion in refractory dermatitis.

    WHO-EORTC Classification of Cutaneous Lymphomas 2018

    Practice similar questions

    Sign up free to access AI-powered MCQ practice with detailed explanations and adaptive learning.

    Start Practicing Free More Dermatology Questions