NEETPGAI
FeaturesBlogComparePricing
Log inStart Free
NEETPGAI

AI-powered NEET PG preparation platform. Master all 19 subjects with adaptive MCQs, AI tutoring, and spaced repetition.

Product

  • Features
  • Subjects
  • Previous Year Questions
  • Compare
  • Pricing
  • Blog

Features

  • Adaptive MCQ Practice
  • AI Tutor
  • Mock Tests
  • Spaced Repetition

Resources

  • Blog
  • Study Guides
  • NEET PG Updates
  • Contact & support

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service

Stay updated

© 2026 NEETPGAI. All rights reserved.
    Subjects/Surgery/Pancreatic Pseudocyst
    Pancreatic Pseudocyst
    medium
    scissors Surgery

    A 52-year-old man presents 8 weeks after an episode of acute interstitial edematous pancreatitis with persistent epigastric pain and early satiety. Transabdominal ultrasound reveals a well-circumscribed anechoic fluid collection marked **A** in the diagram, with a thin echogenic wall and posterior acoustic enhancement. Cyst fluid analysis shows markedly elevated amylase and low CEA. According to the Revised Atlanta Classification (2012), what is the most appropriate initial management for this collection?

    A. Surgical cystgastrostomy as first-line definitive management
    B. Endoscopic transmural drainage with lumen-apposing metal stents under EUS guidance
    C. Immediate percutaneous drainage to prevent infection and hemorrhage
    D. Observation alone, as most pseudocysts <6 cm resolve spontaneously within 6 weeks

    Explanation

    Why "Observation alone, as most pseudocysts <6 cm resolve spontaneously within 6 weeks" is right

    The structure marked A is a well-circumscribed anechoic fluid collection that meets the Revised Atlanta Classification (2012) criteria for a pancreatic pseudocyst: it occurs >4 weeks after acute pancreatitis onset, has a defined fibrous wall (marked B), and contains predominantly liquid with elevated pancreatic enzymes (high amylase, low CEA). According to the Atlanta classification and current ACG pancreatitis guidelines (2024), most small, asymptomatic pseudocysts (<6 cm) resolve spontaneously within 6 weeks and require only observation. Drainage is reserved for symptomatic cysts, those >6 cm persisting >6 weeks, suspected infection, hemorrhage, or rapid growth. This patient's cyst is asymptomatic (no mention of infection or hemorrhage), so observation is the appropriate first-line approach.

    Why each distractor is wrong

    • "Immediate percutaneous drainage to prevent infection and hemorrhage": Percutaneous drainage is reserved for infected or critically ill patients and carries the risk of external pancreatic fistula. It is not indicated for asymptomatic pseudocysts and is not first-line management.
    • "Endoscopic transmural drainage with lumen-apposing metal stents under EUS guidance": While this is the preferred first-line approach for symptomatic pseudocysts or those meeting drainage criteria (size >6 cm, persisting >6 weeks, or complicated), it is not indicated for asymptomatic cysts that are expected to resolve spontaneously.
    • "Surgical cystgastrostomy as first-line definitive management": Surgical drainage is reserved for refractory cases or anatomy unsuitable for endoscopy. It is not first-line and is unnecessary for asymptomatic, small pseudocysts.
    High-YieldNEET PG
    Small, asymptomatic pseudocysts (<6 cm) resolve spontaneously—observe; drainage (endoscopic > percutaneous > surgical) is reserved for symptomatic, large (>6 cm), or complicated cysts.

    Revised Atlanta Classification 2012; ACG Pancreatitis Guidelines 2024

    Practice similar questions

    Sign up free to access AI-powered MCQ practice with detailed explanations and adaptive learning.

    Start Practicing Free More Surgery Questions