## Correct Answer Analysis **Key Point:** Under the Indian Evidence Act (Section 142) and the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences (POCSO) Act 2012, the survivor's past sexual history is generally NOT admissible to prove consent or challenge credibility in rape cases. ### Legal Protection Against Character Evidence **High-Yield:** Section 142 of the Indian Evidence Act states that in prosecutions for rape or attempt to ravish, evidence of the victim's general immoral character is not admissible to prove consent, unless the court permits it in exceptional circumstances (e.g., to prove bias or motive to fabricate). **Mnemonic: POCSO Shield** — **P**ast sexual history, **O**ther relationships, **C**haracter attacks, **S**o-called "consent" defenses are generally **O** (not admissible), **S**ubjective exceptions only, **O**nly in rare cases. ### Correct Legal Principles (Options 0, 2, 3) | Aspect | Legal Standard | |--------|----------------| | **Section 375 (Rape Definition)** | Consent by threat, fear, fraud, or misrepresentation is NOT valid consent | | **Medical Examination Consent** | Informed written consent required; examination cannot be forced even by police | | **Section 376 (Punishment)** | Life imprisonment + fine; if victim < 16 years, minimum 20 years imprisonment | **Clinical Pearl:** The 2013 Criminal Law Amendment Act strengthened protections by narrowing admissibility of sexual history evidence and emphasizing the survivor's right to refuse examination. **Warning:** Confusing Section 142 (inadmissibility of sexual history) with exceptions is a common trap. The default is exclusion; exceptions are rare and require judicial discretion. [cite:Vaya & Srivastava Forensic Medicine & Toxicology Ch 28; Indian Evidence Act Section 142; Criminal Law Amendment Act 2013]
Sign up free to access AI-powered MCQ practice with detailed explanations and adaptive learning.