A 52-year-old man from Bangalore is found incidentally to have a 2.8 cm left renal mass on ultrasound done for unrelated abdominal pain. Contrast-enhanced CT confirms a well-circumscribed, homogeneous mass with homogeneous enhancement in the cortex. Staging CT chest and abdomen show no lymphadenopathy or metastases. Renal function is normal (eGFR 78 mL/min/1.73 m²). The patient is asymptomatic and has no comorbidities. What is the most appropriate next step in management?

Question

Accepted Answer

B. Partial nephrectomy (nephron-sparing surgery). ## Clinical Context This is a **small, localized renal mass (2.8 cm, Stage T1a)** with no metastatic disease. The patient is young, fit, and has normal renal function. The key decision is between **nephron-sparing surgery (partial nephrectomy), ablation, and surveillance**. ## Nephron-Sparing Strategy for Small RCC ```mermaid flowchart TD A[Renal mass <4 cm]:::outcome --> B{Renal function normal?}:::decision B -->|Yes, solitary kidney or CKD| C[Nephron-sparing mandatory]:::urgent B -->|Yes, bilateral kidneys| D{Patient age & fitness?}:::decision D -->|Young, fit| E[Partial nephrectomy preferred]:::action D -->|Elderly, unfit| F[Ablation or surveillance]:::action C --> G[Partial nephrectomy]:::action E --> G G --> H[Excellent oncologic outcomes]:::outcome ``` ## Why Partial Nephrectomy is Correct **Key Point:** For small RCC (<4 cm) in patients with **normal bilateral renal function and good performance status**, **partial nephrectomy (nephron-sparing surgery)** is now the preferred standard of care, offering equivalent oncologic outcomes to radical nephrectomy while preserving renal function. **High-Yield:** - Partial nephrectomy achieves 5-year cancer-free survival rates >95% for T1a tumours, equivalent to radical nephrectomy. - Preserves renal parenchyma → reduces long-term risk of chronic kidney disease and cardiovascular disease. - Recommended by NCCN, EAU, and AUA guidelines as the standard approach for T1a RCC in patients with normal contralateral kidney. - This patient is ideal: young, fit, normal renal function, no comorbidities. **Clinical Pearl:** Even in patients with a solitary kidney or baseline CKD, partial nephrectomy is **mandatory** to preserve renal function. In this patient with bilateral normal kidneys, it is **preferred** over radical nephrectomy. ## Comparison of Options for T1a RCC | Approach | Indication | Pros | Cons | Oncologic Outcome | |----------|-----------|------|------|-------------------| | **Partial nephrectomy** | T1a, normal bilateral kidneys, fit patient | Preserves renal function, excellent cancer control | Technically demanding, longer operative time | 5-yr DFS >95% | | Radical nephrectomy | T1a with solitary kidney contraindication or patient refusal | Simpler surgery, complete tumour removal | Unnecessary renal loss in fit patients | 5-yr DFS >95% | | Ablation (RFA/cryo) | T1a, elderly/unfit, poor surgical candidate | Minimally invasive, outpatient | Higher recurrence in large T1a, less data | 5-yr local control ~90% | | Surveillance | T1a, very elderly, limited life expectancy | Avoids surgery | Risk of delayed diagnosis, tumour growth | Variable, not recommended for fit patients | **Tip:** Ablation is reasonable for very elderly or medically unfit patients; surveillance is acceptable only for patients with <5-year life expectancy or those who refuse intervention. [cite:Robbins 10e Ch 20; NCCN Kidney Cancer Guidelines 2023] ![Renal Cell Carcinoma diagram](https://mmcphlazjonnzmdysowq.supabase.co/storage/v1/object/public/blog-images/explanation/3154.webp)

Answer

A. Percutaneous radiofrequency ablation

Answer

C. Active surveillance with imaging every 3 months

Answer

D. Radical nephrectomy

Explanation

Clinical Context

Nephron-Sparing Strategy for Small RCC

Why Partial Nephrectomy is Correct

Comparison of Options for T1a RCC

Practice similar questions

Join our NEET PG community

Approach	Indication	Pros	Cons	Oncologic Outcome
Partial nephrectomy	T1a, normal bilateral kidneys, fit patient	Preserves renal function, excellent cancer control	Technically demanding, longer operative time	5-yr DFS >95%
Radical nephrectomy	T1a with solitary kidney contraindication or patient refusal	Simpler surgery, complete tumour removal	Unnecessary renal loss in fit patients	5-yr DFS >95%
Ablation (RFA/cryo)	T1a, elderly/unfit, poor surgical candidate	Minimally invasive, outpatient	Higher recurrence in large T1a, less data	5-yr local control ~90%
Surveillance	T1a, very elderly, limited life expectancy	Avoids surgery	Risk of delayed diagnosis, tumour growth	Variable, not recommended for fit patients