NEETPGAI
FeaturesBlogComparePricing
Log inStart Free
NEETPGAI

AI-powered NEET PG preparation platform. Master all 19 subjects with adaptive MCQs, AI tutoring, and spaced repetition.

Product

  • Features
  • Subjects
  • Previous Year Questions
  • Compare
  • Pricing
  • Blog

Features

  • Adaptive MCQ Practice
  • AI Tutor
  • Mock Tests
  • Spaced Repetition

Resources

  • Blog
  • Study Guides
  • NEET PG Updates
  • Contact & support

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service

Stay updated

© 2026 NEETPGAI. All rights reserved.
    Subjects/Pathology/DLBCL Double-Hit MYC + BCL2
    DLBCL Double-Hit MYC + BCL2
    medium
    microscope Pathology

    A 62-year-old man presents with stage IV B-cell lymphoma with B symptoms, elevated LDH, and bone marrow involvement. Morphology is intermediate between DLBCL and Burkitt lymphoma. Flow cytometry shows CD20+, CD10+, BCL6+, BCL2+, MUM1–, with Ki-67 of 85%. FISH analysis reveals the pattern shown in the diagram, with the structure marked **A** (MYC + BCL2 rearrangement) confirmed. Which of the following is the MOST appropriate initial management strategy for this patient?

    A. Rituximab monotherapy with close surveillance
    B. DA-EPOCH-R (dose-adjusted etoposide, prednisone, vincristine, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, rituximab) with intrathecal CNS prophylaxis
    C. R-CHOP followed by observation if complete remission is achieved
    Standard R-CHOP (rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, prednisone) without CNS prophylaxis
    D.

    Explanation

    Why DA-EPOCH-R with intrathecal CNS prophylaxis is right

    The structure marked A — MYC + BCL2 rearrangement (double-hit lymphoma) — defines a high-grade B-cell lymphoma with VERY POOR PROGNOSIS (2-year OS 30–40% with standard R-CHOP). The concurrent MYC rearrangement drives uncontrolled proliferation while BCL2 rearrangement confers apoptosis resistance, creating an aggressive phenotype. According to WHO 2022/ICC 2022 and NCCN B-NHL 2024 guidelines, standard R-CHOP is INSUFFICIENT for double-hit lymphoma. Intensified chemotherapy (DA-EPOCH-R or R-CODOX-M/IVAC) is mandatory, and intrathecal CNS prophylaxis with methotrexate is mandatory given the 15–30% CNS relapse risk in this subset.

    Why each distractor is wrong

    • Standard R-CHOP without CNS prophylaxis: R-CHOP alone is inadequate for double-hit lymphoma and results in poor outcomes. CNS prophylaxis is mandatory, not optional, given the high CNS involvement risk (15–30%).
    • R-CHOP followed by observation if CR: This perpetuates the misconception that R-CHOP is sufficient for double-hit disease. Double-hit lymphoma requires intensified regimens from the outset; observation after R-CHOP is inappropriate.
    • Rituximab monotherapy with surveillance: Monotherapy is grossly inadequate for an aggressive, proliferative lymphoma with apoptosis resistance. This would result in rapid progression and death.
    High-YieldNEET PG
    Double-hit lymphoma (MYC + BCL2) = DA-EPOCH-R + mandatory intrathecal CNS prophylaxis; never use R-CHOP alone.

    WHO 2022; ICC 2022; NCCN B-NHL 2024

    Practice similar questions

    Sign up free to access AI-powered MCQ practice with detailed explanations and adaptive learning.

    Start Practicing Free More Pathology Questions