## Correct Answer: C. Trophoblastic disease The device shown is an intrauterine contraceptive device (IUCD/IUD). Trophoblastic disease (molar pregnancy or gestational trophoblastic neoplasia) is an absolute contraindication for IUCD insertion because the presence of an IUCD in the uterus with trophoblastic tissue creates a high risk of uterine perforation, hemorrhage, and dissemination of trophoblastic cells, potentially leading to malignant transformation and metastatic disease. Additionally, the IUCD may interfere with the diagnosis and monitoring of molar pregnancy through ultrasound and hCG levels. According to Indian guidelines (NRHM/MOHFW) and standard gynecological practice, any suspicion of molar pregnancy mandates exclusion of IUCD insertion until the condition is completely ruled out and the uterus is confirmed to be free of trophoblastic tissue. The presence of trophoblastic disease fundamentally alters the uterine environment and makes IUCD insertion unsafe, unlike the other options which are relative contraindications or timing issues that can be managed with proper counseling and clinical judgment. ## Why the other options are wrong **A. Immediately after delivery** — This is a relative contraindication, not absolute. Immediate postpartum IUCD insertion (within 10 minutes of placental delivery) is actually recommended in many Indian government programs (NRHM guidelines) as it improves continuation rates and reduces expulsion risk. It can be safely performed by trained providers, making this a timing issue rather than an absolute contraindication. **B. Menstruation** — Menstruation is not a contraindication; in fact, IUCD insertion during menstruation is often preferred in Indian clinical practice because the cervix is naturally dilated, insertion is easier, and there is reasonable certainty the woman is not pregnant. This is a favorable timing window, not a contraindication. **D. Ruptured condom during intercourse** — This is a relative contraindication requiring pregnancy exclusion and emergency contraception counseling, but not an absolute contraindication to IUCD insertion. In fact, the IUCD itself can serve as emergency contraception if inserted within 5 days of unprotected intercourse, making it a potential therapeutic option rather than a contraindication. ## High-Yield Facts - **Trophoblastic disease** is the only absolute contraindication to IUCD insertion due to risk of uterine perforation, hemorrhage, and malignant dissemination. - **Postpartum IUCD insertion** within 10 minutes of placental delivery is recommended in Indian NRHM programs and reduces expulsion rates compared to interval insertion. - **Menstruation** is an ideal time for IUCD insertion in Indian practice because cervical dilation is natural and pregnancy is excluded. - **IUCD as emergency contraception** can be inserted within 5 days of unprotected intercourse, including ruptured condom scenarios, with >99% efficacy. - **Relative contraindications** to IUCD include current PID, unexplained vaginal bleeding, and cervical malignancy—these require clinical judgment but are not absolute. ## Mnemonics **IUCD Absolute Contraindication: TROPHOBLAST** **T**rophoblastic disease is the only absolute contraindication. Remember: **T**rophoblast = **T**he only absolute block. All other concerns (postpartum, menstruation, condom rupture) are relative or manageable. **When to Insert IUCD: MEND** **M**enstruation (ideal timing), **E**mergency contraception (within 5 days), **N**on-pregnant (confirmed), **D**elivery (immediate postpartum). These are all favorable windows in Indian practice. ## NBE Trap NBE may lure students into choosing "immediately after delivery" by framing it as a timing concern, when in fact immediate postpartum IUCD insertion is actively promoted in Indian government family planning programs. The trap conflates "timing consideration" with "contraindication." ## Clinical Pearl In Indian public health settings, immediate postpartum IUCD insertion is a key strategy to improve contraceptive uptake in the postpartum period when women are motivated and accessible. However, any suspicion of molar pregnancy (elevated hCG, abnormal ultrasound) must be completely excluded first—this is the one scenario where IUCD insertion is absolutely contraindicated and the uterus must be evacuated and monitored before considering any intrauterine device. _Reference: DC Dutta's Textbook of Obstetrics (8th ed.) Ch. 24 (Contraception); NRHM Guidelines on IUCD Insertion; Harrison Ch. 297 (Contraception)_
Sign up free to access AI-powered MCQ practice with detailed explanations and adaptive learning.