NEETPGAI
FeaturesBlogComparePricing
Log inStart Free
NEETPGAI

AI-powered NEET PG preparation platform. Master all 19 subjects with adaptive MCQs, AI tutoring, and spaced repetition.

Product

  • Features
  • Subjects
  • Previous Year Questions
  • Compare
  • Pricing
  • Blog

Features

  • Adaptive MCQ Practice
  • AI Tutor
  • Mock Tests
  • Spaced Repetition

Resources

  • Blog
  • Study Guides
  • NEET PG Updates
  • Contact & support

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service

Stay updated

© 2026 NEETPGAI. All rights reserved.
    Subjects/Pathology/Lymphomas — Hodgkin
    Lymphomas — Hodgkin
    medium
    microscope Pathology

    A 28-year-old man from Delhi presents with a 3-month history of progressive painless cervical lymphadenopathy, fever, and night sweats. Excisional lymph node biopsy shows classical Hodgkin lymphoma (cHL), nodular sclerosis subtype. CT chest and abdomen are normal. PET-CT shows uptake only in cervical nodes (Stage IA). What is the most appropriate next step in management?

    A. Observation with 3-monthly clinical review and repeat imaging
    B. Combined modality therapy: 2 cycles ABVD followed by IFRT 30 Gy
    C. Involved-field radiotherapy (IFRT) 30 Gy to cervical region alone
    D. ABVD chemotherapy (doxorubicin, bleomycin, vinblastine, dacarbazine) for 4 cycles

    Explanation

    Clinical Context

    This patient has early-stage (Stage IA) classical Hodgkin lymphoma with favorable prognostic features (young age, limited disease, no bulky mass). The standard of care for early-stage cHL has evolved toward combined modality therapy (CMT) to optimize cure while minimizing late toxicity.

    Treatment Rationale for Early-Stage cHL

    Key Point
    Early-stage cHL (Stage I–II) with favorable risk factors is best treated with combined modality therapy: 2–4 cycles of chemotherapy (ABVD or escalated BEACOPP) followed by involved-field radiotherapy (IFRT).
    High-YieldNEET PG
    The combination of chemotherapy + IFRT achieves ≥90% 5-year progression-free survival in early-stage cHL, with significantly lower relapse rates than either modality alone.
    Why Combined Modality Therapy?
    1. 1.
      Chemotherapy component — eradicates micrometastatic disease and systemic burden
    2. 2.
      Radiotherapy component — provides local control and reduces risk of nodal relapse
    3. 3.
      Reduced toxicity — 2 cycles ABVD + IFRT (30 Gy) has lower cumulative cardiopulmonary and secondary malignancy risk than either full-course chemotherapy or extended radiation alone
    Dosing & Duration
    • ABVD: 2 cycles for early-stage favorable disease (vs. 4 cycles for intermediate/unfavorable)
    • IFRT: 30 Gy in 15 fractions to involved field (cervical nodes in this case)
    • Total duration: ~12 weeks
    Clinical Pearl
    Modern protocols prioritize de-escalation in favorable early-stage disease to reduce late toxicities (secondary malignancies, cardiac dysfunction, pulmonary fibrosis) while maintaining excellent cure rates.

    Why Not the Other Options?

    Table
    OptionWhy Incorrect
    Observation aloneUnacceptable; early-stage cHL is curable with active treatment. Observation is not standard and risks progression.
    ABVD 4 cycles onlyChemotherapy monotherapy for early-stage cHL has higher relapse rates (20–25%) compared to CMT (5–10%). IFRT is needed for optimal local control.
    IFRT alone (30 Gy)Radiotherapy monotherapy has been largely abandoned due to higher relapse rates and risk of late toxicities. Chemotherapy is essential to address systemic disease risk.

    Harrison 21e Ch 104

    Practice similar questions

    Sign up free to access AI-powered MCQ practice with detailed explanations and adaptive learning.

    Start Practicing Free More Pathology Questions

    Join our NEET PG community

    Daily MCQs, study tips, and topper strategies on Telegram.

    Join on Telegram →