NEETPGAI
BlogComparePricing
Log inStart Free
NEETPGAI

AI-powered NEET PG preparation platform. Master all 19 subjects with adaptive MCQs, AI tutoring, and spaced repetition.

Product

  • Subjects
  • Previous Year Questions
  • Compare
  • Pricing
  • Blog

Features

  • Adaptive MCQ Practice
  • AI Tutor
  • Mock Tests
  • Spaced Repetition

Resources

  • Blog
  • Study Guides
  • NEET PG Updates
  • Help Center

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service

Stay updated

© 2026 NEETPGAI. All rights reserved.
    Subjects/Pathology/Pemphigus Vulgaris — Flaccid Bullae
    Pemphigus Vulgaris — Flaccid Bullae
    hard
    microscope Pathology

    A 48-year-old woman of South Asian descent presents with a 3-month history of painful oral erosions initially thought to be recurrent aphthous ulcers. Over the past 4 weeks, flaccid bullae have appeared on her trunk and flexural areas, rupturing easily with minimal trauma. On examination, gentle lateral pressure on apparently normal-appearing skin of the forearm results in immediate epidermal separation and blister formation, as marked **D** in the diagram. Which of the following best explains the pathophysiologic basis of this clinical finding?

    A. Disruption of hemidesmosomes leading to tense bullae that do not rupture with minor pressure
    B. Subepidermal separation at the dermal-epidermal junction due to anti-BP180 and anti-BP230 antibodies
    C. Granular IgA deposition at the dermal-epidermal junction associated with tissue transglutaminase antibodies
    D. Loss of keratinocyte-to-keratinocyte adhesion due to IgG autoantibodies against desmogleins, resulting in acantholysis

    Explanation

    ## Why "Loss of keratinocyte-to-keratinocyte adhesion due to IgG autoantibodies against desmogleins, resulting in acantholysis" is right The Nikolsky sign in pemphigus vulgaris reflects the fundamental pathology: IgG autoantibodies against desmoglein 3 (and/or desmoglein 1) bind to desmosomal adhesion molecules on keratinocytes, disrupting cell-to-cell adhesion. This causes acantholysis—loss of intercellular cohesion within the epidermis—leading to suprabasal blistering. The positive Nikolsky sign (epidermal shearing with gentle pressure on normal-appearing skin) is pathognomonic for this loss of adhesion and is a hallmark of pemphigus vulgaris. The clinical presentation (painful oral erosions as initial manifestation, flaccid bullae, South Asian ethnicity, middle-aged) and the positive Nikolsky sign together confirm the diagnosis (Robbins 10e Ch 25; Harrison 21e Ch 56). ## Why each distractor is wrong - **Subepidermal separation at the dermal-epidermal junction due to anti-BP180 and anti-BP230 antibodies**: This describes bullous pemphigoid, not pemphigus vulgaris. Bullous pemphigoid produces tense (firm, non-flaccid) bullae that do not rupture easily, and the Nikolsky sign is characteristically NEGATIVE. The split is subepidermal, not intraepidermal. - **Granular IgA deposition at the dermal-epidermal junction associated with tissue transglutaminase antibodies**: This describes dermatitis herpetiformis, which presents with intensely pruritic vesicles (not painful erosions) on extensor surfaces and buttocks, is almost always associated with celiac disease, and has a completely different immunofluorescence pattern. Nikolsky sign is not a feature. - **Disruption of hemidesmosomes leading to tense bullae that do not rupture with minor pressure**: This again describes bullous pemphigoid. Tense bullae and negative Nikolsky sign are the opposite of what is seen here. Hemidesmosomes are disrupted in subepidermal blistering disorders, not in pemphigus. **High-Yield:** Nikolsky sign POSITIVE = pemphigus (intraepidermal acantholysis, flaccid bullae); Nikolsky sign NEGATIVE = bullous pemphigoid (subepidermal, tense bullae). [cite: Robbins 10e Ch 25; Harrison 21e Ch 56]

    Practice similar questions

    Sign up free to access AI-powered MCQ practice with detailed explanations and adaptive learning.

    Start Practicing Free More Pathology Questions