NEETPGAI
BlogComparePricing
Log inStart Free
NEETPGAI

AI-powered NEET PG preparation platform. Master all 19 subjects with adaptive MCQs, AI tutoring, and spaced repetition.

Product

  • Subjects
  • Previous Year Questions
  • Compare
  • Pricing
  • Blog

Features

  • Adaptive MCQ Practice
  • AI Tutor
  • Mock Tests
  • Spaced Repetition

Resources

  • Blog
  • Study Guides
  • NEET PG Updates
  • Help Center

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service

Stay updated

© 2026 NEETPGAI. All rights reserved.
    Subjects/Medicine/Spirometry — Specific Airway Conductance (sGaw) Plethysmography
    Spirometry — Specific Airway Conductance (sGaw) Plethysmography
    hard
    stethoscope Medicine

    A 7-year-old boy with suspected asthma is referred for pulmonary function testing. He is unable to perform reproducible forced expiratory maneuvers on spirometry. Body plethysmography is performed, and the parameter marked **D** in the diagram shows a value of 0.05 sec⁻¹·cmH₂O⁻¹, which is markedly reduced below the lower limit of normal (LLN 0.13). Which of the following best explains why this parameter is superior to FEV₁ alone for assessing airway obstruction in this patient?

    A. It is effort-independent and does not require maximal forced expiration, making it reliable in uncooperative children and those unable to perform spirometry
    B. It directly measures the elastic recoil of the lungs and is unaffected by patient cooperation
    C. It quantifies the degree of emphysematous destruction and correlates with DLCO
    D. It identifies the specific location of obstruction by measuring pressure gradients across the glottis

    Explanation

    ## Why option 1 is correct The parameter marked **D** is specific airway conductance (sGaw), defined as airway conductance normalized to functional residual capacity (sGaw = Gaw/FRC). Unlike FEV₁, which requires maximal forced expiration, sGaw is derived from body plethysmography measurements during quiet panting against a closed shutter and open mouthpiece—maneuvers that do not demand patient effort or cooperation. This makes sGaw the gold standard for assessing airway obstruction in children, neuromuscular disease, and uncooperative patients who cannot perform reproducible spirometry. The markedly reduced value (0.05 vs. normal 0.13–0.35) confirms obstruction despite the inability to generate valid spirometric data. ## Why each distractor is wrong - **Option 2**: Elastic recoil is measured by static compliance and pressure-volume curves, not sGaw. sGaw measures airway conductance (reciprocal of resistance), which is independent of elastic properties. Elastic recoil is also effort-dependent and not the reason sGaw is superior in uncooperative patients. - **Option 3**: Emphysematous destruction is assessed by DLCO and CT imaging, not sGaw. While sGaw may be elevated in emphysema due to loss of elastic recoil, the clinical anchor here is obstruction (markedly reduced sGaw), not emphysema. sGaw does not directly quantify parenchymal destruction. - **Option 4**: While sGaw can help distinguish upper from lower airway obstruction by comparing Raw at different lung volumes, it does not directly measure glottic pressure gradients. Laryngoscopy and esophageal manometry are required for that. The primary advantage in this clinical scenario is effort-independence, not anatomic localization. **High-Yield:** sGaw = Gaw/FRC is the most sensitive, effort-independent marker of airway obstruction; use it when spirometry is unreliable (children, neuromuscular disease, poor cooperation). [cite: ATS/ERS Standards 2022; Pellegrino R, Eur Respir J 2005]

    Practice similar questions

    Sign up free to access AI-powered MCQ practice with detailed explanations and adaptive learning.

    Start Practicing Free More Medicine Questions