Wound Healing MCQ — NEET PG Practice Question | NEETPGAI
Wound Healing
medium
microscope Pathology
A 32-year-old man presents with a surgical wound that has failed to heal 6 weeks after appendicectomy. Clinical examination reveals erythema, induration, and purulent discharge. The wound edges are not approximated. Which investigation is most appropriate to identify the causative organism and guide antimicrobial therapy?
A. Procalcitonin level
B. Blood culture
C. Gram stain and culture of wound swab
D. Histopathology of wound tissue
Explanation
Investigation of Choice for Infected Wound
Key Point
Gram stain and culture of wound swab is the gold standard for identifying causative organisms in wound infections and guiding targeted antimicrobial therapy.
This patient is at 6 weeks (late proliferative/early remodeling phase) with signs of infection — culture is essential.
High-YieldNEET PG
In clinical practice, wound swab culture has >90% sensitivity for identifying aerobic pathogens (Staphylococcus aureus, Streptococcus pyogenes, Escherichia coli, Pseudomonas aeruginosa) and anaerobes if collected properly.
Clinical Pearl
Swabs should be taken from the wound base or purulent material, not from the surrounding skin, to avoid contamination and false positives.
Why Not the Other Options?
Histopathology — Useful for assessing granulation tissue quality and fibroblast activity, but does NOT identify organisms; requires tissue biopsy (invasive, delays treatment)
Blood culture — Indicated only if systemic signs of sepsis (fever, hypotension, elevated WBC); local wound infection does not routinely bacteremia
Procalcitonin — Inflammatory marker; useful for severity assessment but does NOT identify the organism and cannot guide targeted therapy
Practice similar questions
Sign up free to access AI-powered MCQ practice with detailed explanations and adaptive learning.